This paper supports that scientists should bring back extinct animals. Technology has enabled the world to recover what it has lost. Shapiro, a professional biologist, asserted that bringing back extinct animals is exhilarating (21). It is exhilarating due to the opportunities of understanding life and boosting conservation efforts. De-extinction is a reality and, therefore, should be.
This brings about the question, should extinct animals be brought back? Many argue for, and others against this issue. Currently, scientists have devised different ways in which extinct animals can be revived; through cloning, back breeding and genetic engineering (Mara 9). This paper supports that scientists should bring back extinct animals.
In his article, he tells the tale of a young boy Ben Novak who is so incensed with the thought of having the extinct passenger pigeon back StudentShare Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done.
De-extinction, the science of bringing back extinct life, is the subject of the April 2013 cover story of National Geographic magazine. Once only an idea in science fiction, today it is poised to become reality. Researchers working to bring back animals like the passenger pigeon and woolly mammoth discuss the implications of their work. You can learn more about the subject at.
Write your argument beginning on page 1 of your essay booklet. Topic: Should extinct species be brought back into existence? Your Task: Carefully read each of the four texts provided. Then, using evidence from at least three of the texts, write a well-developed argument regarding whether extinct species should be brought back into existence. Clearly establish your claim, distinguish your claim.
Looking back hundreds or thousands of years, though, the types of environments, plants, and animals, vary from virtually the same to drastically different. Animals have either evolved or gone extinct as the environment changed, new species came and went, or humans impacted them. There is controversy whether extinct animals should be left.
Forget Jurassic Park, bringing the extinct back from the dead is no longer beyond the realms of possibility and could even save some animals from going extinct in the first place.
But using genetic engineering to bring back extinct animals might be considered reasonable in some circumstances. 'I think there is potentially an argument for bringing back something that we humans made extinct. So if someone was going to bring back the passenger pigeon, then I think you could justify that. They were living in a modern ecosystem and could fit in.' The passenger pigeon.
They should not be brought back because they could kill or extinct a lot or all humans. We could lose our habitats for animals that aren't extinct trying to make homes for the brought back animals. If this helped you please like! These are facts that have been stated from different texts.
Think about what species you have become and describe your life, your habitat, your daily rituals and what caused your endangered or extinct status. Prompt 4: The polar bear’s existence is under threat due to many factors: illegal killings, pollution, and legal trade in skins and animal parts. But one of the largest threats to the polar bear is climate change. As the ice caps melt, there is.
Bringing extinct animals back can help the environment. The world we live in now is full of threatened or damaged ecosystems. Scientists believe that introducing extinct animals that can restore these ecosystems back to life would be very beneficial.
Resurrection scientists argue that extinct beasts wouldn't be brought back just for us to gawp at. While not true members of the extinct species, they could have the physical and behavioral.